Gee, how come paper after paper which ran the story of the conviction in the UK of hatemongering imam Abu Hamza al-Masri stuck a headline on it characterizing the guy as a "Radical Cleric"... and yet the Red Star headline writer (as did the fellow who composed the headline for the WaPo story) somehow put the whitewash to al-Masri by calling him a (wait for it)... "Fiery Cleric"?
